Summary

This study evaluates the session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method for monitoring exercise training intensity compared to heart rate (HR) methods. Conducted in two parts, the research found that the session RPE method effectively quantifies training across various exercises, including high-intensity and prolonged activities. The findings suggest that RPE can serve as a valid, practical tool for coaches to assess and adjust training periodization plans.

Highlights -📊

• Effective Monitoring: The session RPE method is validated for various exercise types.
• High Consistency: RPE and HR methods show a strong correlation in quantifying exercise.
• Practical Tool: RPE is simple to use and requires minimal instruction for athletes.
• Versatile Application: RPE can be applied to high-intensity and team sports training.
• Training Load Assessment: Both methods help quantify training load for better performance evaluation.
• Subjective vs. Objective: RPE offers a subjective assessment that complements objective HR data.
• Potential for Periodization: RPE can aid in creating effective training periodization plans.

Key Insights -🔍

• RPE Validity: The session RPE method correlates well with HR measurements, indicating its reliability. This is crucial for coaches who need a straightforward way to assess training load without complex equipment.
• Applicability Across Exercises: The study highlights RPE’s versatility, demonstrating its effectiveness in both cycling and basketball, which are fundamentally different in their energy demands. This underlines the method’s broad relevance for various athletic disciplines.
• Simplicity in Training: Athletes can easily understand and apply the session RPE method, making it accessible for regular use. This ease of use can encourage consistent monitoring, leading to better training outcomes.
• Insight into Training Dynamics: RPE provides a holistic view of training intensity, capturing fluctuations in effort that may not be evident through HR alone, especially in high-intensity activities.
• Potential for Predicting Performance: The correlation between training load and performance outcomes using RPE suggests that it could be a valuable predictor of athletic success, guiding coaches in making strategic adjustments.
• Integration of Training Metrics: The combination of RPE and HR data allows for a more comprehensive understanding of training effects, leading to more informed coaching decisions.
• Reduction of Monitoring Errors: Unlike HR methods, which can fail due to technical issues, RPE does not rely on equipment, thus reducing the chance of losing valuable training data.